Sigh
Someone once mentioned how recent decades have failed to bring about any mind-blowing invention or phenomena that has rocked the world. Nothing like the airplane, the telephone, the television-- even the most pervasive modern technology, the internet, has its roots in the 60s.
While I do not have any concrete explanation for this observation, I do have something to suggest. Inventions have come and been there with us for many centuries already. Hence its hard to create that 1 new niche area that is so completely new it blows us off-- complete originality is, surely, the first and foremost quality a product has to have before it qualifies itself to be an invention as opposed to an improvement. And yet at the same time complete originality is, however creative one is, so hard to achieve now these days, because our ancestors had the advantage of casting the first brick. A flying car can easily seen as an improvement on cars, and cars themselves can, albeit with more difficulty, be seen as cousins of trains--they just utilize lighter engines, rubber tyres and a different frame. Wi-fi can be seen as the modern-day telegraph system, blogs the modern-day form of a diary, a radio station, a propaganda tower, a sex gallery, whichever you prefer.
On top of all that, such new inventions, while creative, are still themselves in the hands of other technologies. Simply put, its hard to get that really WOW discovery or invention which was entirely new, like the steam engine and electricity, simply because with the large number of inventions already out there, chances are, something has got to be gotten from something WOW before it already, so it cant be that magnificently original. Its like jeans in some way. Someone came up with jeans. Its cool. So someone else comes up with stone-washed ones. He comes up with low-cut ones. He comes up with faded jeans. They are, on this scale, excellent designs (beg to differ though, because the only pair of jeans i own is a black one which I bought because it was cheaper than a black dress pants, but looks like one from afar), but are, by and large, still jeans. So someone wants to be original and come up with something else. So he thinks of bermudas. Nope, already taken. So he thinks of skirts. Nope, already taken. Dress pants. Already there. Culottes? Thats 18th century. You can think of any new design that corresponds to any length of leg they cover, but when everythings been taken, you cant have a WOW thing just like the initial pair of jeans did. You can only improve, like short denim skirts, but not innovate, because any variable length of the leg has been convered already.
Of course, science isnt as restricted as fashion. Recent decades are not totally devoid of discoveries as they are deficient in romance. We've got genetics, we've got robotics. Give them time and there'd be WOW stuff. There probably is already, just not on the scale that is needed to revolutionize our lives, our thinking.
While I do not have any concrete explanation for this observation, I do have something to suggest. Inventions have come and been there with us for many centuries already. Hence its hard to create that 1 new niche area that is so completely new it blows us off-- complete originality is, surely, the first and foremost quality a product has to have before it qualifies itself to be an invention as opposed to an improvement. And yet at the same time complete originality is, however creative one is, so hard to achieve now these days, because our ancestors had the advantage of casting the first brick. A flying car can easily seen as an improvement on cars, and cars themselves can, albeit with more difficulty, be seen as cousins of trains--they just utilize lighter engines, rubber tyres and a different frame. Wi-fi can be seen as the modern-day telegraph system, blogs the modern-day form of a diary, a radio station, a propaganda tower, a sex gallery, whichever you prefer.
On top of all that, such new inventions, while creative, are still themselves in the hands of other technologies. Simply put, its hard to get that really WOW discovery or invention which was entirely new, like the steam engine and electricity, simply because with the large number of inventions already out there, chances are, something has got to be gotten from something WOW before it already, so it cant be that magnificently original. Its like jeans in some way. Someone came up with jeans. Its cool. So someone else comes up with stone-washed ones. He comes up with low-cut ones. He comes up with faded jeans. They are, on this scale, excellent designs (beg to differ though, because the only pair of jeans i own is a black one which I bought because it was cheaper than a black dress pants, but looks like one from afar), but are, by and large, still jeans. So someone wants to be original and come up with something else. So he thinks of bermudas. Nope, already taken. So he thinks of skirts. Nope, already taken. Dress pants. Already there. Culottes? Thats 18th century. You can think of any new design that corresponds to any length of leg they cover, but when everythings been taken, you cant have a WOW thing just like the initial pair of jeans did. You can only improve, like short denim skirts, but not innovate, because any variable length of the leg has been convered already.
Of course, science isnt as restricted as fashion. Recent decades are not totally devoid of discoveries as they are deficient in romance. We've got genetics, we've got robotics. Give them time and there'd be WOW stuff. There probably is already, just not on the scale that is needed to revolutionize our lives, our thinking.
