Hmm
Peculiar circumstances lead to uncommon thoughts. I was wondering today what would happen if the swine flu outbreak had occured sooner, and if it were so severe exams are cancelled. I wonder what action the school would take. At a glance, there are two possible scenarios: (A) award final grades based on midterms/essays/one's cumulative assignment grade, or (B) null all grades for CAP calculation, but still award module credits for those who display a satisfactory performance before the final exams (eg. attended most tutorials, got a C and above for assignments).
I think (B) would be fairer for students as a whole. I don't think it's justified to extrapolate one's midterm or CA grade to the final grade, for various reasons. For one, students who have a poor midterm or CA grade may not have gotten so because of laziness or other personal inadequacies. They could have tried new approaches to essays, presentations, they could have been taken unaware by the kind of questions certain teachers like to set, their projects could have been adversely affected by team mates, and so on. Even if they were deliberately lazy for the midterms or assignments, they should only be punished in proportion to the percentage stipulated right from the start, for their very laziness could be due to the knowledge that this or that particular assignment is only 20%. If it were established that midterms would be 80%, I'm pretty certain they would display a relatively hardworking attitude even if they are very lazy students. Another way of looking at the issue is that no student should get an A as a final grade even if he or she got an A for 30% or 40% of the course. Same goes for the worst grades.
Just some random and completely useless thoughts, as usual.
I think (B) would be fairer for students as a whole. I don't think it's justified to extrapolate one's midterm or CA grade to the final grade, for various reasons. For one, students who have a poor midterm or CA grade may not have gotten so because of laziness or other personal inadequacies. They could have tried new approaches to essays, presentations, they could have been taken unaware by the kind of questions certain teachers like to set, their projects could have been adversely affected by team mates, and so on. Even if they were deliberately lazy for the midterms or assignments, they should only be punished in proportion to the percentage stipulated right from the start, for their very laziness could be due to the knowledge that this or that particular assignment is only 20%. If it were established that midterms would be 80%, I'm pretty certain they would display a relatively hardworking attitude even if they are very lazy students. Another way of looking at the issue is that no student should get an A as a final grade even if he or she got an A for 30% or 40% of the course. Same goes for the worst grades.
Just some random and completely useless thoughts, as usual.

